| An old Lonicera fragrantissima (Winter Honeysuckle) blooming in Isham Park |
Friday, February 28, 2020
Monday, April 22, 2019
Earth Day 2019
| Star Magnolia blooms on a windy April day, Isham Park. |
It has been five years since the completion of the water service restoration for Isham Park. Watering has been immensely important for the establishment and maintenance of plantings, especially during periods of drought we commonly experience.
To water! one of the most important elements for our survival and that of our planet.
Happy Earth Day!
Tuesday, October 9, 2018
No fences surround VIP Gardens
| The Evergreen garden, originally planted 2011-14; this photo: June 2018 |
Gardens added by VIP in Isham Park share one feature: no fencing surrounds them, so that the experience of the landscape is not interrupted or privatized.
Below is a list of the gardens VIP has planted since the group formed in June 2009. A couple of links to blog posts describing their origin are included here:
| The Memorial garden, planted in fall 2010; shown in summer 2018. |
- "The memorial" garden (in memory of the Isham family) at the circular stone terrace above Broadway; this has a bronze plaque detailing gifts of land made for the park by Isham family members. The area had no garden until this was planted by VIP in 2010 in advance of the Isham Park Centennial (September 29, 2012). Dorothy Rowan was NYC Parks Gardener for the initial planting. The garden consists of a concentric semi-circular strip around west side the circular stone terrace and its carved stone benches. See the post in this blog: http://volunteersishampark.blogspot.com/2010/12/fall-2010-volunteers-for-isham-park.html
- "The evergreen" garden. A grouping of evergreen trees and shrubs in the north lawn west of the fence surrounding Bruce's Garden, planted by master gardener John Emmanuel in 2010. This was added to by VIP with NYC Parks gardeners, including Dorothy Rowan, in 2013-14 in advance of the Water Service Restoration project which had been funded by money allocated by then NYC Council Member Robert Jackson. Please note, this garden has recently been expanded as a curved border along the north end of the lawn almost to PTW.
| "The Margin" garden along PTW, planted in 2009, this was taken in spring 2018 |
- "The margin" garden - a formerly barren strip of ground between a stone retaining wall and the sidewalk along the northeast end of Park Terrace West (PTW), south of West 215th Street. See the post about the planting in this blog: http://volunteersishampark.blogspot.com/2010/05/thank-you-for-great-help-in-isham-park.html and a later post with images: http://volunteersishampark.blogspot.com/2010/07/sidewalk-margin-garden-along-park.html
- "The Triangle" garden at the beginning of the Park Terrace East Circle south of Bruce's Garden which was cleared of weeds and planted by VIP after the completion of the Water Service Restoration in 2016. This is at the location of the NYC Parks job box and water connection south of Bruce's Garden.
- "The PTW Tray," Daffodils and Tulips were planted in this existing abandoned bed on the west side of PTW below the diagonal steps for Its My Park Day in October 2014.
Plants have been added over time in most of these. VIP continues to maintain them and related paths and edges. NYC Parks Gardener Walter Markham has given some plants, advice, and assistance since he came on board here in 2014. He and longtime Inwood resident and early VIP Maria Lall are to be thanked for their work in the fenced gardens along the south Broadway entrance path, Isham Street, and Seaman Avenue and for their planting up the steps above the park's legendary Ginkgo.
News! Inwood may have its first small historic district close to Isham Park in the related "Park Terrace" area:
https://patch.com/new-york/washington-heights-inwood/row-inwood-homes-may-be-way-landmark-status
Monday, August 6, 2018
Landmarks Conservancy supports preservation for Inwood
http://www.nylandmarks.org/advocacy/preservation_issues/conservancy_urges_lpc_to_protect_inwood_before_rezoning_complete/
The NYC Council will vote to rezone Inwood this Wednesday August 8th.
To comment on the rezoning, please email Ydanis Rodriguez today (yrodriguez@council.nyc.gov)
Friday, June 15, 2018
Today: NYT's article on historic Broadway includes Isham Park & Inwood
![]() |
| Slide from the Broadway Corridor historic district proposed in 2016 |
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/14/arts/design/broadway-walking-tour-hidden-gems.html
Will the new chair of the LPC see the light and correct the fact that there are no Historic Districts in Inwood today?
LPC designate a Broadway Corridor Historic District for Inwood!
Wednesday, August 16, 2017
Letter received from the LPC today
![]() |
| From the Broadway Corridor Historic District for Inwood slide presentation. |
Today, August 16, 2017, another letter regarding the Broadway Corridor Historic District for Inwood arrived from the LPC. It was essentially a restatement of the rationale given in their earlier letter. In fact, points and a request in the letter VIP sent to them on August 3rd were not addressed and the southern boundary of the district was given incorrectly as "beginning roughly at Dyckman Street."
Much of the letter sent to the LPC on August 3rd was about the southern boundary of Inwood, which we described as beginning at 193rd and Broadway. Above and below are two of the slides included in the Broadway Corridor Inwood Historic District slide presentation which should have made the boundaries very clear to the LPC. The boundaries were also specifically referenced in the letter sent to them on August 3rd. Please note: the area below Dyckman Street was excluded from the re-zoning of Inwood.
![]() |
| From the Broadway Corridor Historic District for Inwood slide presentation |
Thursday, August 3, 2017
Letters regarding the VIP Historic District proposal for Inwood
Earlier this summer, we posted about a Request for Evaluation submitted to the NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC) for a proposed historic district for Inwood. About a week later, VIP received a letter rejecting the request.
Today, we sent a response to the the LPC's letter objecting to the rejection and requesting more information.
The text of the response letter to the NYC LPC from VIP/IP:
Today, we sent a response to the the LPC's letter objecting to the rejection and requesting more information.
The text of the response letter to the NYC LPC from VIP/IP:
"Thank you for your recent letter
concerning the Broadway Corridor Historic District for Inwood, Manhattan.
We were both surprised and disappointed to find that the Landmarks
Preservation Commission (LPC) stated:
“…the recommended historic district lacks the
necessary cohesiveness and sense of place necessary to define a potential
historic district. This is based on the
different typologies (apartment buildings, smaller houses, commercial and
manufacturing buildings, substations, various parks, playfields, a large
bridge, among others), as well as the wide range of building ages, styles and
scales found in the area.”
The LPC has designated large
districts with “different typologies” and “building ages, styles and scales” in
other NYC neighborhoods both recently* and in the past. The LPC has redrawn boundaries or excluded
some elements as part of the designation process. We ask that the LPC treat the Broadway
Corridor Historic District proposed for Inwood in a similar manner, as Inwood
currently has no designated historic district.
Inwood was chosen as one of
the Historic District Council’s first “Six to Celebrate” communities in 2011.
At that time a Reconnaissance Survey database of the area was created. In early
2012, a meeting was held at which the LPC staff was asked for assistance with
designation. Finally, the Request for
Evaluation (RFE) for the Broadway Corridor district was submitted in October
2016, during the recent Economic Development Corporation (EDC) attempt to
rezone Inwood.
The proposed Broadway
Corridor district recalls the 1939 WPA Guide description of Inwood** which
includes the triangular portion in the valley below Dyckman Street beginning at
West 193rd Street, an area not included in the 2011 database study
or the EDC’s re-zoning plan. It is our
contention that built Inwood is still much as it was described in the 1939 WPA
Guide. The proposed district also includes civic, commercial, and residential
buildings east of Broadway. We are aware
that other RFEs have recently been submitted for Inwood. However, those RFE’s do not include the many historic
elements in the areas south of Dyckman
Street and east of Broadway. These portions of
Inwood should be part of any large historic district.
The LPC should be open to working
with Inwood and giving some feedback, especially in light of the rezoning and
especially because LPC Chair Srinivasan has publicly stated that the Commission
is interested in the rezoning areas. To
eliminate Inwood in its entirety from consideration is unacceptable, as it is
at odds with the agency's stated priorities.
We ask that the LPC provide
the community with actionable information about how current or future historic
district proposals for Inwood may move forward.
Volunteers for Isham Park
/ Inwood Preservation
cc: LPC Commissioner &
Chair Meenakshi Srinivasan, Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer, NYC
Council Member Ydanis Rodriguez, Director of the Historic Districts Council
Simeon Bankoff, Community Board 12 Manhattan Land Use Committee Chair Wayne
Benjamin
*Related recent designation
of a large historic district with “different typologies” and “diversity of
building ages, styles and scales” similar to those of the Broadway Corridor
Inwood, Manhattan Historic District:
From
the LPC’s Morningside Heights Historic District narrative designated February
21, 2017:
“The Commission furthers finds that among its special
qualities, the Morningside Heights Historic District contains a large
collection of architecturally significant examples of residential building
types including apartment houses, row houses and fraternity houses, and
ecclesiastical buildings dating from the 1890s to the 1920s; that the
development of the area took place over a very brief period of time; that the
period of greatest development coincided with the planned arrival and opening
of the IRT subway in 1904; that as a result of this late development the
dominant housing type is the apartment house; that these apartment houses range
in height from six to 15 stories; that they are executed in a variety of
historicist styles including Renaissance Revival, Colonial Revival, Tudor
Revival, Georgian Revival, and Secessionist…”
**1939 WPA GUIDE description:
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)



